IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 8 6 14 0.241 0.0524 0.0514 0.1869 0.1833
2019-20 — OJHL 52 9 17 26 0.500 0.1226 0.1226 0.3422 0.3422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA — 28 3 10 13 0.464
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA — 16 2 3 5 0.312
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA — 28 6 12 18 0.643
2020-21 St. Olaf D1 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14080
Defenseman overall
#2429
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Rylott
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Johansson
Endicott · 2017-18
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Keane
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.