IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Johansson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-06 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 13 3 2 5 0.385 0.1428 0.1420 0.4072 0.4049
2018-19 Northern Cyclones NCDC 49 9 16 25 0.510 0.1438 0.1357 0.4131 0.3900
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SR 27 1 11 12 0.444
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SO 3 0 2 2 0.667
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE FR 22 3 9 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2019-20 · Endicott
+361.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29948
Forward overall
#1273
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Hatton
Tufts · 2016-17
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Grant
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Raver
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.