IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Hatton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 38 4 25 29 0.763 0.1763 0.1780 0.3734 0.3770
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 48 16 44 60 1.250 0.2888 0.2785 0.6116 0.5898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D1 NESCAC JR 20 2 1 3 0.150
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 20 2 1 3 0.150
2018-19 Tufts D1 NESCAC SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2017-18 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Tufts
+53.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11101
Forward overall
#460
Forward born in 1996
#123
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Fortin
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Kuzyk
Adrian · 2006-07
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.