IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Place Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 48 10 11 21 0.438 0.1072 0.1137 0.3012 0.3195
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 49 21 23 44 0.898 0.2201 0.2236 0.6183 0.6280
2008-09 — OJHL 36 10 11 21 0.583 0.1430 0.1379 0.4016 0.3873
2009-10 — OJHL 49 38 32 70 1.429 0.3501 0.3193 0.9836 0.8969
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 22 5 15 20 0.909
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 26 9 12 21 0.808
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 22 11 12 23 1.046
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 17 4 3 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2010-11 · SUNY Potsdam
+95.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15089
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 1989
#469
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Nuzzolilo
Framingham State · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.