IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Place Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 48 10 11 21 0.438 0.1222 0.1296 0.3019 0.3203
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 49 21 23 44 0.898 0.2509 0.2548 0.6197 0.6294
2008-09 — OJHL 36 10 11 21 0.583 0.1630 0.1572 0.4025 0.3882
2009-10 — OJHL 49 38 32 70 1.429 0.3992 0.3640 0.9859 0.8990
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 22 5 15 20 0.909
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 26 9 12 21 0.808
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 22 11 12 23 1.046
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 17 4 3 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2010-11 · SUNY Potsdam
+71.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11210
Forward overall
#441
Forward born in 1989
#553
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Duszynski
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.