IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Nuzzolilo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Northeast Generals NA3HL 45 24 34 58 1.289 0.1618 0.1667 0.4069 0.4193
2022-23 Northeast Generals NA3HL 47 38 33 71 1.511 0.1896 0.1868 0.4769 0.4699
2023-24 Northeast Generals NA3HL 4 4 2 6 1.500 0.1883 0.1765 0.4735 0.4438
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 26 9 9 18 0.692
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 26 9 6 15 0.577
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 25 4 11 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2023-24 · Framingham State
+292.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13858
Forward overall
#665
Forward born in 2003
#174
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Becker
Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elliot Van Orsdel
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Dysart
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.