IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 49 5 12 17 0.347 0.1002 0.0990 0.2611 0.2581
2017-18 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 35 0 15 15 0.429 0.1213 0.1133 0.2701 0.2522
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 23 2 21 23 1.000
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 25 9 19 28 1.120
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 23 4 20 24 1.044
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2018-19 · Bryn Athyn
+927.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10642
Defenseman overall
#1618
Defenseman born in 1997
#1426
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Palmiscno
St. John's · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Pomposelli
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blayne Goodman
Wentworth · 2001-02
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.