IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Palmiscno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 9 24 33 0.589 0.1134 0.1110 0.3716 0.3637
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 56 6 16 22 0.393 0.1444 0.1343 0.4147 0.3857
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 28 5 11 16 0.571
2011-12 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2010-11 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2009-10 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 8 8 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2009-10 · Saint John's
+498.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35264
Forward overall
#1196
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Nikac
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin O'Connor
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Mauro
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.