IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Palmiscno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 9 24 33 0.589 0.1667 0.1631 0.3713 0.3634
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 56 6 16 22 0.393 0.1459 0.1357 0.4160 0.3869
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. John's D3 — SR 28 5 11 16 0.571
2011-12 St. John's D3 — JR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2010-11 St. John's D3 — SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2009-10 St. John's D3 — FR 25 8 8 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2009-10 · St. John's
+410.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26881
Forward overall
#1089
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Nikac
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin O'Connor
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Mauro
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.