IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin O'Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Topeka Capitals NA3HL 45 10 17 27 0.600 0.0723 0.0706 0.1895 0.1851
2015-16 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 36 8 25 33 0.917 0.1105 0.1026 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 19 2 6 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+396.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13038
Defenseman overall
#1685
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eli Riddle
Concordia Wisconsin · 2010-11
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Brown
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Usher
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.