IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Riddle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 55 7 10 17 0.309 0.1136 0.1122 0.3263 0.3222
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 1 14 15 0.600
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 1 14 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2012-13 · Concordia
+466.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13624
Defenseman overall
#1482
Defenseman born in 1991
#4501
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Sandberg
Nichols · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Mono
Curry · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.