← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 NAHL 45 1 4 5 0.111 0.0408 0.0422 0.1173 0.1213
2015-16 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 52 9 13 22 0.423 0.1554 0.1538 0.4466 0.4421
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 57 13 27 40 0.702 0.2578 0.2412 0.7407 0.6930
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 10 5 3 8 0.800
2019-20 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 26 7 6 13 0.500
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 26 2 8 10 0.385
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 2 9 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2017-18 · Saint John's
+126.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7301
Defenseman overall
#1228
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.