← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Pomposelli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Walpole Express EHLP 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0098 0.0098 0.0282 0.0282
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 12 9 5 14 1.167 0.2352 0.2352 0.5340 0.5340
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 43 14 10 24 0.558 0.1198 0.1160 0.2733 0.2647
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 23 7 6 13 0.565
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 29 9 8 17 0.586
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 27 7 12 19 0.704
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 20 5 4 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2022-23 · Southern New Hampshire
+221.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24815
Forward overall
#942
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.