IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Baxter Kimball Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 20 1 5 6 0.300 0.0644 0.0644 0.1469 0.1469
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 36 9 15 24 0.667 0.1431 0.1384 0.3265 0.3157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 — 29 5 7 12 0.414
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 — 27 8 7 15 0.556
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 17 3 2 5 0.294
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36388
Forward overall
#1581
Forward born in 2001
#1012
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Coykendall
Adrian · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Mark
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Brenton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.