IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Coykendall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 30 9 19 28 0.933 0.2003 0.2018 0.4570 0.4604
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 55 16 19 35 0.636 0.1816 0.1669 0.4926 0.4526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 31 13 13 26 0.839
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 6 3 9 0.391
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 25 7 6 13 0.520
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 12 2 4 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Adrian
+223.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21611
Forward overall
#907
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Louis DiMatteo
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.