← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Coykendall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 30 9 19 28 0.933 0.2156 0.2172 0.4567 0.4601
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 55 16 19 35 0.636 0.1380 0.1268 0.4924 0.4525
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 31 13 13 26 0.839
2020-21 Adrian D1 NCHA JR 23 6 3 9 0.391
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 6 3 9 0.391
2019-20 Adrian D1 NCHA SO 25 7 6 13 0.520
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 25 7 6 13 0.520
2018-19 Adrian D1 NCHA FR 12 2 4 6 0.500
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 12 2 4 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Adrian
+258.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21009
Forward overall
#953
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.