← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis DiMatteo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Toronto Patriots OJHL 7 0 4 4 0.571 0.1401 0.1491 0.3934 0.4186
2014-15 Toronto Patriots OJHL 49 1 17 18 0.367 0.0900 0.0911 0.2529 0.2560
2015-16 Toronto Patriots OJHL 54 8 34 42 0.778 0.1906 0.1824 0.5355 0.5125
2016-17 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 52 7 28 35 0.673 0.1650 0.1505 0.4634 0.4227
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cortland D1 JR 16 1 8 9 0.562
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 16 1 8 9 0.562
2018-19 Cortland D1 SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 21 2 12 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2017-18 · SUNY Cortland
+332.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7407
Defenseman overall
#1240
Defenseman born in 1996
#1548
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.