IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Ring-Jarvi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 1 6 7 0.140 0.0520 0.0535 0.1482 0.1524
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 61 12 17 29 0.475 0.1765 0.1728 0.5034 0.4928
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 57 12 13 25 0.439 0.1629 0.1515 0.4644 0.4318
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 29 11 22 33 1.138
2010-11 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 27 9 17 26 0.963
2009-10 Gustavus Adolphus D3 — SO 29 16 24 40 1.379
2008-09 Gustavus Adolphus D3 — FR 30 10 21 31 1.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2008-09 · Gustavus Adolphus
+654.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29096
Forward overall
#1127
Forward born in 1987
#3432
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Larkee
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.