IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Ring-Jarvi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 1 6 7 0.140 0.0514 0.0528 0.1478 0.1520
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 61 12 17 29 0.475 0.1747 0.1710 0.5018 0.4912
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 57 12 13 25 0.439 0.1611 0.1498 0.4629 0.4304
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 29 11 22 33 1.138
2010-11 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 27 9 17 26 0.963
2009-10 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 29 16 24 40 1.379
2008-09 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 30 10 21 31 1.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2008-09 · Gustavus Adolphus
+662.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36086
Forward overall
#1169
Forward born in 1987
#3656
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Day
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.