← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank D'Ancona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 49 4 5 9 0.184 0.1084 0.1145 0.5517 0.5829
2022-23 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0983 0.0987 0.5007 0.5030
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 59 20 27 47 0.797 0.2927 0.2928 0.8408 0.8411
2024-25 NAHL 45 10 4 14 0.311 0.1143 0.1083 0.3284 0.3113
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 8 17 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2025-26 · Norwich
+453.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32803
Forward overall
#1981
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.