← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank D'Ancona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 49 4 5 9 0.184 0.1129 0.1193 0.5412 0.5718
2022-23 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.1025 0.1030 0.4911 0.4933
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 59 20 27 47 0.797 0.3156 0.3157 0.8364 0.8367
2024-25 NAHL 45 10 4 14 0.311 0.1233 0.1169 0.3266 0.3096
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 8 17 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2025-26 · Norwich
+412.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33013
Forward overall
#1988
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.