← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian DiFelice Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 45 11 16 27 0.600 0.1676 0.1784 0.4141 0.4407
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 28 5 13 18 0.643 0.1796 0.1812 0.4437 0.4477
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 10 31 41 0.976 0.2728 0.2631 0.6737 0.6497
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 8 28 36 0.857 0.2395 0.2194 0.5915 0.5419
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 14 5 3 8 0.571
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 24 4 7 11 0.458
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+77.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16024
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 1997
#1033
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.