← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian DiFelice Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 45 11 16 27 0.600 0.1471 0.1566 0.4131 0.4397
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 28 5 13 18 0.643 0.1576 0.1590 0.4426 0.4466
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 10 31 41 0.976 0.2393 0.2308 0.6721 0.6481
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 8 28 36 0.857 0.2101 0.1925 0.5901 0.5407
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 14 5 3 8 0.571
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 24 4 7 11 0.458
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+102.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20993
Forward overall
#950
Forward born in 1997
#849
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.