← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Gauthier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Soo Eagles NAHL 45 2 2 4 0.089 0.0327 0.0338 0.0938 0.0970
2015-16 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 52 22 29 51 0.981 0.2127 0.1954 0.7588 0.6971
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA JR 17 7 4 11 0.647
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 17 7 4 11 0.647
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SO 24 4 11 15 0.625
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 24 4 11 15 0.625
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 20 4 7 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+391.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31365
Forward overall
#1320
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.