← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Movalli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Steele County Blades USPHL-Premier 14 5 0 5 0.357 0.0403 0.0403 0.1212 0.1212
2021-22 Steele County Blades USPHL-Premier 39 19 15 34 0.872 0.0983 0.1068 0.2960 0.3216
2023-24 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 25 18 8 26 1.040 0.1523 0.1547 0.5094 0.5175
2024-25 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 45 21 22 43 0.956 0.1399 0.1349 0.4681 0.4514
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wilkes D3 MAC 3 1 0 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Wilkes
+172.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15456
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.