← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter LeBlanc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-03 Country: Canada
2006 · Round 6, Pick #186  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
HPK · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 49 14 22 36 0.735 0.1801 0.1941 0.5058 0.5451
2005-06 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 21 10 12 22 1.048 0.2568 0.2673 0.7213 0.7507
2015-16 HPK Liiga 46 2 8 10 0.217 0.5435 0.5069 1.8688 1.7430
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 39 14 21 35 0.897
2008-09 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 38 14 16 30 0.789
2007-08 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 37 5 10 15 0.405
2006-07 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 39 1 4 5 0.128
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2006-07 · New Hampshire
-37.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9398
Forward overall
#384
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.