← New Search ↗ Social Card

Domenic Settimo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 40 11 8 19 0.475 0.0536 0.0578 0.1616 0.1744
2018-19 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 7 12 19 0.380 0.0878 0.0878 0.3073 0.3073
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 40 9 19 28 0.700 0.1618 0.1618 0.5660 0.5660
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 25 15 8 23 0.920
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 29 8 19 27 0.931
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 21 14 12 26 1.238
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 16 6 4 10 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · SUNY Cortland
+1162.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
98%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17597
Forward overall
#767
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.