← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0852 0.0958 0.2119 0.2382
2012-13 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 40 6 15 21 0.525 0.0894 0.0959 0.2225 0.2387
2013-14 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 56 20 25 45 0.804 0.1369 0.1404 0.3406 0.3493
2014-15 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 41 16 28 44 1.073 0.1828 0.1768 0.4548 0.4400
2015-16 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 50 16 19 35 0.700 0.1192 0.1096 0.2967 0.2728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC JR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Fitchburg State
+185.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28386
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 1995
#300
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.