← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1272 0.1430 0.2074 0.2332
2012-13 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 40 6 15 21 0.525 0.1335 0.1432 0.2178 0.2337
2013-14 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 56 20 25 45 0.804 0.2044 0.2096 0.3334 0.3419
2014-15 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 41 16 28 44 1.073 0.2729 0.2640 0.4453 0.4308
2015-16 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 50 16 19 35 0.700 0.1780 0.1637 0.2904 0.2670
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 JR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 JR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Fitchburg State
+91.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26066
Forward overall
#1002
Forward born in 1995
#307
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.