IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Knochenmus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 41 2 4 6 0.146 0.0580 0.0599 0.1536 0.1587
2011-12 — NAHL 56 14 31 45 0.804 0.3184 0.3134 0.8437 0.8304
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 19 32 51 0.962 0.3813 0.3561 1.0103 0.9436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 23 7 11 18 0.783
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 27 22 16 38 1.407
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 22 5 13 18 0.818
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-3.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16874
Forward overall
#644
Forward born in 1992
#935
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.