IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Devine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 South Shore Kings NCDC 46 12 16 28 0.609 0.2482 0.2409 0.4893 0.4749
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE — 27 8 7 15 0.556
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE — 30 11 7 18 0.600
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10761
Forward overall
#492
Forward born in 1997
#305
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ashton Amaya
Aurora · 2016-17
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Williams
Concordia · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eliot Grauer
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.