← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Atkinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 21 4 2 6 0.286 0.0613 0.0613 0.1399 0.1399
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 44 10 29 39 0.886 0.1902 0.1872 0.4341 0.4271
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 24 3 1 4 0.167
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2022-23 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Castleton
+99.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30082
Forward overall
#1193
Forward born in 2001
#609
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.