← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Abbott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0273 0.0287 0.0622 0.0655
2006-07 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 49 32 43 75 1.531 0.4598 0.4610 1.0477 1.0504
2007-08 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 48 42 41 83 1.729 0.5195 0.4974 1.1836 1.1331
2015-16 Frölunda HC SHL 42 14 21 35 0.833 2.0833 1.9091
2018-19 Mora IK SHL 42 7 29 36 0.857 2.1427 1.6629
2019-20 Leksands IF SHL 33 7 14 21 0.636 1.5910 1.5910
2020-21 Augsburger Panther DEL 32 9 18 27 0.844 0.9228 0.9228
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 39 21 41 62 1.590
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 36 17 23 40 1.111
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 38 9 19 28 0.737
2008-09 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 38 7 9 16 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2008-09 · Maine
+1.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 15 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#587
Forward overall
#19
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.