← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Ciampini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Wexford Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3004 0.3398 0.6845 0.7743
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 15 3 5 8 0.533 0.1602 0.1740 0.3650 0.3964
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 14 16 30 0.750 0.2253 0.2331 0.5134 0.5312
2009-10 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 42 46 88 1.796 0.5395 0.5299 1.2293 1.2073
2010-11 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 50 33 49 82 1.640 0.4927 0.4610 1.1226 1.0503
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC SR 39 26 24 50 1.282
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC JR 41 23 18 41 1.000
2012-13 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 11 10 21 0.583
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC FR 15 3 3 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2011-12 · Union
-4.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6995
Forward overall
#300
Forward born in 1990
#78
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.