← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Ciampini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Wexford Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.2451 0.2772 0.6885 0.7788
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 15 3 5 8 0.533 0.1307 0.1419 0.3672 0.3987
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 14 16 30 0.750 0.1838 0.1902 0.5164 0.5343
2009-10 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 42 46 88 1.796 0.4402 0.4323 1.2365 1.2144
2010-11 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 50 33 49 82 1.640 0.4020 0.3761 1.1291 1.0564
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC SR 39 26 24 50 1.282
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC JR 41 23 18 41 1.000
2012-13 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 11 10 21 0.583
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC FR 15 3 3 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2011-12 · Union
+17.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7417
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 1990
#71
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.