IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrison Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Holderness NE-Prep 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0193 0.0193 0.0458 0.0458
2019-20 Holderness NE-Prep 28 2 11 13 0.464 0.0896 0.0896 0.2125 0.2125
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.0514 0.0526 0.1723 0.1764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 24 0 3 3 0.125
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16314
Defenseman overall
#2911
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Strand
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Crouse
Bethel · 2007-08
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Bournazos
Neumann · 2009-10
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.