IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Bournazos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 56 14 26 40 0.714 0.2624 0.2718 0.7539 0.7810
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 40 9 13 22 0.550 0.2021 0.2012 0.5805 0.5780
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 57 17 20 37 0.649 0.2385 0.2253 0.6851 0.6473
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 6 10 16 0.593
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC JR 23 4 13 17 0.739
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SO 28 13 8 21 0.750
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC FR 22 2 5 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2011-12 · Neumann
+72.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20886
Forward overall
#815
Forward born in 1990
#1438
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Tatro
Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.