← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Bertrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 15 28 43 0.827 0.2027 0.1940 0.5660 0.5417
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 19 44 63 1.189 0.2914 0.2640 0.8137 0.7372
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 29 7 19 26 0.897
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 6 14 20 0.714
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 26 6 11 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2023-24 · Norwich
+193.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2843
Defenseman overall
#735
Defenseman born in 2002
#466
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.