IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Dann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 13 8 10 18 1.385 0.1588 0.1588 0.3121 0.3121
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0800 0.0834 0.1694 0.1766
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 40 13 26 39 0.975 0.2252 0.2231 0.4771 0.4725
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 26 8 5 13 0.500
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 26 6 6 12 0.462
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Albertus Magnus
+51.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21114
Forward overall
#1136
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eliot Grauer
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Amaya
Aurora · 2016-17
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.