IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Welsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Krefeld Pinguine · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Oakville Blades OJHL 48 17 35 52 1.083 0.2655 0.2542 0.7459 0.7141
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 36 47 83 1.694 0.4152 0.3762 1.1663 1.0568
2016-17 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 36 13 16 29 0.806 2.0140 2.0545 6.8300 6.9674
2018-19 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 26 7 11 18 0.692 1.7308 1.5782 5.8695 5.3519
2019-20 Krefeld Pinguine DEL 45 7 8 15 0.333 0.8332 0.8332 2.8258 2.8258
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC JR 40 27 17 44 1.100
2010-11 Union D1 ECAC SO 40 16 21 37 0.925
2009-10 Union D1 ECAC FR 39 10 9 19 0.487
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2009-10 · Union
+73.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 21 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3954
Forward overall
#177
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.