← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Hadland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 18 3 0 3 0.167 0.0211 0.0211 0.0405 0.0405
2020-21 Prior Lake USHS-MN 19 8 10 18 0.947 0.1199 0.1199 0.2301 0.2301
2021-22 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 34 18 18 36 1.059 0.1329 0.1329 0.3343 0.3344
2022-23 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 32 38 70 1.489 0.1869 0.1785 0.4702 0.4491
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of New England D3 CNE JR 28 10 8 18 0.643
2024-25 University of New England D3 CNE 10 0 2 2 0.200
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · University of New England
-8.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16909
Forward overall
#891
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2014-15
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.