| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.1157 | 0.1293 | 0.5139 | 0.5741 |
| 2003-04 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 55 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.255 | 0.1472 | 0.1565 | 0.6539 | 0.6953 |
| 2004-05 | — | OHL | 52 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 0.423 | 0.2448 | 0.2476 | 1.0872 | 1.0996 |
| 2005-06 | Belleville Bulls | OHL | 40 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 0.850 | 0.4917 | 0.4727 | 2.1841 | 2.0995 |
| 2006-07 | Belleville Bulls | OHL | 55 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 0.782 | 0.4523 | 0.4106 | 2.0088 | 1.8236 |
| 2007-08 | Carleton Univ. | USports-M | 11 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.909 | 0.4796 | 0.5141 | 2.6646 | 2.8563 |
| 2008-09 | Carleton Univ. | USports-M | 28 | 9 | 24 | 33 | 1.179 | 0.6218 | 0.6335 | 3.4545 | 3.5194 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.