IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0501 0.0554 0.1141 0.1261
2009-10 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 56 24 43 67 1.196 0.3594 0.3784 0.8189 0.8621
2010-11 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 42 20 41 61 1.452 0.4363 0.4390 0.9942 1.0004
2022-23 Vityaz Moscow Region KHL 66 20 19 39 0.591 1.4772 1.1780 — —
2023-24 Vityaz Moscow Region KHL 38 20 10 30 0.789 1.9737 1.4636 — —
2024-25 — KHL 60 13 17 30 0.500 1.2500 0.8900 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 31 7 12 19 0.613
2012-13 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 41 16 22 38 0.927
2011-12 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 37 16 22 38 1.027
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2011-12 · UMass Lowell
+189.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#414
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Pelton
UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.