IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roman Wainwright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 50 7 12 19 0.380 0.1549 0.1590 0.3054 0.3135
2024-25 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 51 17 18 35 0.686 0.2798 0.2748 0.5516 0.5417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2025-26 · Johnson & Wales
+135.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12643
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 2005
#379
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brody Seitz
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrey Manov
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
J.B. Baker
Nichols · 2014-15
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.