IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Di Giuseppe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-09 Country: Canada
2012 · Round 2, Pick #38  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — OJHL 56 16 31 47 0.839 0.2057 0.2316 0.5779 0.6506
2010-11 — OJHL 49 24 39 63 1.286 0.3151 0.3401 0.8852 0.9553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Michigan D1 BigTen — 35 13 11 24 0.686
2012-13 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig — 40 9 19 28 0.700
2011-12 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig — 40 11 15 26 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2011-12 · Michigan
+155.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13539
Forward overall
#501
Forward born in 1993
#371
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Karson Kuhlman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Eiserman
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Galt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joel L'Esperance
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.