IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Treacy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Markham Waxers OJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2794 0.2894 0.6901 0.7149
2003-04 Wexford Raiders OJHL 41 9 8 17 0.415 0.1158 0.1148 0.2861 0.2835
2004-05 Wexford Raiders OJHL 35 11 22 33 0.943 0.2634 0.2477 0.6507 0.6120
2005-06 — OJHL 44 15 30 45 1.023 0.2857 0.2582 0.7058 0.6378
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 25 11 27 38 1.520
2008-09 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 26 20 20 40 1.538
2007-08 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 26 8 16 24 0.923
2006-07 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 25 13 11 24 0.960
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2006-07 · SUNY Potsdam
+341.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15641
Forward overall
#572
Forward born in 1985
#987
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrik Peltola
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Singer
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.