← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Oller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-17 Country: USA
Nazareth
Verbal UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 46 11 31 42 0.913 0.3722 0.3671 0.7339 0.7238
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · SUNY Plattsburgh
-60.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4631
Forward overall
#106
Forward born in 2005
#49
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Nazareth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.73
actual FR PPG at Nazareth
0.89
actual FR PPG at Nazareth
0.54
actual FR PPG at Nazareth
0.68
actual FR PPG at Nazareth

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.