IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Oller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 46 11 31 42 0.913 0.3722 0.3671 0.7339 0.7238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · SUNY Plattsburgh
-60.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
15%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4629
Forward overall
#106
Forward born in 2005
#49
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin MacLellan
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.