IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Matsukubo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.1549 0.1708 0.5527 0.6093
2022-23 Nepean Raiders CCHL 53 12 17 29 0.547 0.1187 0.1255 0.4234 0.4478
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 52 20 18 38 0.731 0.2979 0.3050 0.5874 0.6013
2024-25 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 55 38 26 64 1.164 0.2524 0.2421 0.9003 0.8636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · St. Olaf
-12.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12081
Forward overall
#532
Forward born in 2004
#121
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.