IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Danforth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 — OJHL 47 13 23 36 0.766 0.1877 0.1972 0.5274 0.5541
2011-12 — OJHL 41 22 27 49 1.195 0.2929 0.2948 0.8228 0.8282
2012-13 — OJHL 43 22 34 56 1.302 0.3192 0.3054 0.8966 0.8578
2018-19 — Liiga 59 18 34 52 0.881 2.2035 2.2667 7.5766 7.7937
2019-20 — Liiga 56 27 33 60 1.071 2.6785 2.6785 9.2099 9.2099
2020-21 — KHL 58 23 32 55 0.948 2.3708 2.3708 13.0663 13.0663
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 37 10 22 32 0.865
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 36 20 21 41 1.139
2014-15 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 38 7 15 22 0.579
2013-14 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 36 5 24 29 0.806
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2013-14 · Sacred Heart
+212.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 23 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#25
Forward overall
#2
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.