IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Connors Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 2 14 16 0.667 0.1286 0.1286 0.3051 0.3051
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0402 0.0402 0.0953 0.0953
2023-24 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 2 8 10 0.357 0.0689 0.0689 0.1634 0.1634
2024-25 Navan Grads CCHL 55 2 14 16 0.291 0.0631 0.0625 0.2252 0.2229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19044
Defenseman overall
#3361
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
P.J. Heger
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dmitry Ermakov
Norwich · 2011-12
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.