| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 52 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 0.558 | 0.1781 | 0.1749 | 0.4317 | 0.4239 |
| 2016-17 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 54 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 0.463 | 0.1478 | 0.1374 | 0.3584 | 0.3331 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | St. Thomas | D3 | — | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.