IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alan Boozer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 42 17 18 35 0.833 0.1925 0.1839 0.6885 0.6380
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2016-17 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2015-16 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 27 5 4 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Johnson & Wales
+111.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16956
Forward overall
#589
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Wallace
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stallard
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.