IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Sikura Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-01 Country: Canada
2014 · Round 6, Pick #178  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Aurora Tigers OJHL 44 6 12 18 0.409 0.1003 0.1121 0.2817 0.3147
2012-13 Aurora Tigers OJHL 46 8 20 28 0.609 0.1492 0.1592 0.4191 0.4473
2013-14 Aurora Tigers OJHL 41 17 47 64 1.561 0.3826 0.3888 1.0747 1.0922
2023-24 Skellefteå AIK SHL 49 10 16 26 0.531 1.3265 1.2185 6.9236 6.3601
2024-25 — KHL 56 13 16 29 0.518 1.2948 1.1227 7.1360 6.1877
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 35 22 32 54 1.543
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 38 21 36 57 1.500
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 39 10 18 28 0.718
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 25 5 2 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Northeastern
+10.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1157
Forward overall
#61
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.