IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Tonge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Nybro Vikings IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Collingwood Blues OJHL 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.0592 0.0663 0.1662 0.1862
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0545 0.0583 0.1530 0.1638
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 53 29 43 72 1.359 0.3330 0.3395 0.9353 0.9535
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 39 28 41 69 1.769 0.4336 0.4196 1.2181 1.1787
2022-23 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 52 19 40 59 1.135 1.5199 1.4626 2.0359 1.9592
2023-24 EV Landshut DEL2 23 9 12 21 0.913 1.2231 1.1426 1.6383 1.5305
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 39 19 20 39 1.000
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 41 17 27 44 1.073
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 38 20 24 44 1.158
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 28 0 11 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Robert Morris
+18.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3007
Forward overall
#172
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Coffman
Utica · 2022-23
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.