IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Tonge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Nybro Vikings IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Collingwood Blues OJHL 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.0725 0.0812 0.1652 0.1851
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0667 0.0714 0.1521 0.1628
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 53 29 43 72 1.359 0.4081 0.4160 0.9299 0.9480
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 39 28 41 69 1.769 0.5315 0.5143 1.2110 1.1719
2022-23 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 52 19 40 59 1.135 0.4895 0.4711 — —
2023-24 EV Landshut DEL2 23 9 12 21 0.913 0.3939 0.3680 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 — SR 39 19 20 39 1.000
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 — JR 41 17 27 44 1.073
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 — SO 38 20 24 44 1.158
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 — FR 28 0 11 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Robert Morris
-3.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2949
Forward overall
#169
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
New England · 2017-18
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.