IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abbott Girduckis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-28 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
ERC Ingolstadt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 12 7 19 0.358 0.0879 0.0941 0.2468 0.2643
2013-14 Wellington Dukes OJHL 52 14 19 33 0.635 0.1555 0.1586 0.4369 0.4456
2014-15 Wellington Dukes OJHL 45 29 32 61 1.356 0.3323 0.3217 0.9333 0.9037
2023-24 Eisbären Regensburg DEL2 52 22 49 71 1.365 1.8291 1.7097 2.4501 2.2902
2024-25 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 27 1 9 10 0.370 0.9260 0.8923 3.1403 3.0262
2025-26 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 50 12 22 34 0.680 1.7000 1.7179 5.7652 5.8258
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 RIT D1 AHA SR 38 11 25 36 0.947
2017-18 RIT D1 AHA JR 37 7 20 27 0.730
2016-17 RIT D1 AHA SO 37 7 14 21 0.568
2015-16 RIT D1 AHA FR 34 5 4 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2015-16 · RIT
+20.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#4019
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.