← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Prapavessis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-07 Country: Canada
2014 · Round 4, Pick #105  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Signed Professionally
EHC Freiburg · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 25 2 9 11 0.440 0.1078 0.1183 0.3029 0.3324
2013-14 Toronto Patriots OJHL 47 5 49 54 1.149 0.2816 0.2947 0.7910 0.8277
2022-23 EHC Freiburg DEL2 30 4 16 20 0.667 0.8931 0.8836 1.1963 1.1835
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 RPI D1 ECAC SR 37 0 19 19 0.513
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC JR 36 2 14 16 0.444
2015-16 RPI D1 ECAC SO 40 4 15 19 0.475
2014-15 RPI D1 ECAC FR 41 1 7 8 0.195
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · RPI
-7.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.