| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | St. Michael's Buzzers | OJHL | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.1226 | 0.1367 | 0.3443 | 0.3839 |
| 2001-02 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 46 | 21 | 26 | 47 | 1.022 | 0.2504 | 0.2663 | 0.7034 | 0.7480 |
| 2002-03 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 48 | 48 | 54 | 102 | 2.125 | 0.5208 | 0.5323 | 1.4631 | 1.4955 |
| 2004-05 | Brampton Battalion | OHL | 65 | 25 | 46 | 71 | 1.092 | 0.6319 | 0.5904 | 2.8067 | 2.6222 |
| 2005-06 | Brampton Battalion | OHL | 32 | 28 | 44 | 72 | 2.250 | 1.3016 | 1.1509 | 5.7814 | 5.1121 |
| 2014-15 | Färjestad BK | SHL | 24 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.458 | 1.1458 | 0.9292 | 5.9802 | 4.8498 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Maine | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 20 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.450 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.