IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Theocharidis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-28 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
IF Björklöven · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pickering Panthers OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 57 6 10 16 0.281 0.0609 0.0656 0.2172 0.2341
2016-17 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 57 7 22 29 0.509 0.1104 0.1132 0.3937 0.4037
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 57 17 41 58 1.018 0.2207 0.2149 0.7872 0.7666
2023-24 Kalmar HC Allsvenskan 51 14 29 43 0.843 2.1077 2.1387 7.9099 8.0261
2024-25 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 49 12 16 28 0.571 1.4285 1.3622 5.3608 5.1119
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 35 4 11 15 0.429
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 31 5 10 15 0.484
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 38 3 10 13 0.342
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 34 4 7 11 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Bowling Green
+96.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#65
Defenseman overall
#36
Defenseman born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.